The "Migraineur" Controversy

“Migraineur” is a term used to denote a person who has migraine. As a writer and word-nerd, I began using the word as soon as I learned it, happy to find a succinct replacement for a four-word phrase. Then I learned that migraineur is a controversial term.

Why is "migraineur" a controversial term?

Here’s the uproar: some people believe that if I call myself a migraineur, I identify first and foremost with migraine rather than with anything else in my life. To them, it’s an indication that my identity is wrapped up in — or completely dependent on — having migraine. To them, calling myself a migraineur is a sign that I enjoy the benefits of being sick and don’t want to get better.

Migraine doesn't define my identity

Ha! I want nothing more than to get better. I see no benefits in being sick. Yet I cannot deny that migraine plays a role in my identity. I don’t want this to be true, but migraine influences every aspect of my life — from the work I do to activities I’m able to enjoy to the city I live in. My identity is not wrapped up in migraine; it’s more that migraine has usurped my identity.

What were my thoughts?

When I first learned the term migraineur was controversial, I didn’t think much of it. After all, people who have diabetes are called diabetics and people who have epilepsy are called epileptics, right? Well, yes and no. It turns out that those terms are also controversial.

What about "diabetics" and "epileptics"? People in online diabetes and epilepsy communities say the same thing—they are more than diabetes or epilepsy and do not want to be defined by a medical condition. The word choice also speaks to notions of control. I read an argument from someone who has epilepsy that saying “I have epilepsy” is more active than “I am epileptic” and, as such, implies that she is in control of the illness, not the other way around.Language influences perspectiveThe language we use influences how we see the world — this is one of my core beliefs. Given that and the rational arguments I’ve read, I should prefer “people with migraine” to migraineurs. But I don’t.I don't call myself a migraineurInterestingly, though, I don’t call myself a migraineur. I only use it to refer to other people or to groups of people who have migraine. Whenever my personal experience comes up, I always say, “I have migraine” or “I have chronic migraine.” The fact that I am a person is more important than the diagnosis I carry, so I say that I have an illness, not that I am a migraineur.Switching to person-first languageI drafted this article through the previous paragraph and then put it aside for more than a year. Six months after writing it, I realized that “person who has migraine” had naturally replaced “migraineur” in my writing. The original argument — that it causes people to tie their identities to having migraine — carries little weight with me. The ideas from people with diabetes and epilepsy were more persuasive.Eliminating the stigma my own wayUltimately, I decided that it’s not up to me to decide how someone defines themselves. Yes, it’s a little less cumbersome to write “migraineurs” rather than “people with migraine.” But the extra wordiness is worthwhile if it makes some readers feel more comfortable or more empowered. Migraine does enough on its own to erode people’s identity — I won’t use language that could potentially help it along.

By providing your email address, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.

This article represents the opinions, thoughts, and experiences of the author; none of this content has been paid for by any advertiser. The team does not recommend or endorse any products or treatments discussed herein. Learn more about how we maintain editorial integrity here.

Join the conversation

or create an account to comment.

Community Poll

Do you prefer reading stories from others with migraine or informational content on our site?